Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 12 |
| 2017-03-01 | 2022-06-23 |
| 5.75 x 2.87 x 0.31 inches | 6.43 x 2.99 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 6.88 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and White | Moonlight Silver, Nebula Green and Night Black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 440.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD | AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1300 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P10 MT6755 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP2 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.48 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Poco F4 is better than HTC U Play, with an 87.5 score against 73.5. The Xiaomi Poco F4 design is way newer and a bit thinner, but also a lot heavier than the HTC U Play. The Xiaomi Poco F4 counts with just a bit better hardware performance than HTC U Play, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Poco F4 also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
Xiaomi Poco F4 counts with a better display than HTC U Play, because although it has a quite inferior quantity of pixels per inch in the display, it also counts with a bit higher 1080 x 2400 resolution and a bigger screen. The Xiaomi Poco F4 features a greater camera than HTC U Play, because it has a much better (4K) video definition, a bigger aperture and a camera in the back with way more megapixels.
The HTC U Play counts with a way bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Poco F4, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 1,95 TB. Xiaomi Poco F4 has a much better battery life than HTC U Play, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.