Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 78.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2017-03-01 | 2020-07-14 |
| 5.75 x 2.87 x 0.31 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and White | Green and Greener, Out of the Blue and Two Shades of Black |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 440.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD | IPS LCD |
| 424 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P10 MT6755 chipset | Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP2 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.48 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro has a global score of 78.7, which is slightly better than the HTC U Play's 73.5 general score. Even though the Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro is way newer than the HTC U Play, it is way heavier and thicker. The Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro counts with a bit better performance than HTC U Play, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM.
HTC U Play features a little more vivid screen than Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro, because although it has a lot smaller screen and a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 1920px, it also counts with a just a little more pixels per inch in the screen. The HTC U Play features slightly more memory for games and applications than Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro, because although it has just 32 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that supports up to 1,95 TB.
Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro has a very superior battery life than HTC U Play, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity. Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro shoots way better photographs and videos than HTC U Play, because it has a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, a bigger aperture to take better images in low-light situations and a camera with much more mega-pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.