Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 78.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2017-03-01 | 2020-11-27 |
| 5.75 x 2.87 x 0.31 inches | 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and White | Cool blue, Power black and Yellow |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 440.00 | $ 149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD | IPS LCD |
| 424 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P10 MT6755 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP2 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 9.13 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.48 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Poco M3 has a general score of 78.2, which is just a bit better than the HTC U Play's overall score of 73.5. The Xiaomi Poco M3 body is a lot newer than the HTC U Play's, although it's way heavier and somewhat thicker. The HTC U Play has a little more vivid display than Xiaomi Poco M3, because although it has a bit worse 1080 x 1920px resolution and a lot smaller display, it also counts with a little higher number of pixels in each inch in the display.
HTC U Play counts with a bit bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Poco M3, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. The HTC U Play and the Xiaomi Poco M3 feature quite similar CPUs, and although the Xiaomi Poco M3 has a greater amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores.
The Xiaomi Poco M3 takes much better pictures and videos than HTC U Play, and although they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Xiaomi Poco M3 also has a larger aperture to take better images and videos in low light situations and a way better resolution camera in the back.
Xiaomi Poco M3 features a way better battery duration than HTC U Play, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity.
Xiaomi Poco M3 not only is the best phones of the ones we are comparing, but it's also by far the cheapest one, making it very easy to pick between these phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.