Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-03-01 | 2020-02-11 |
| 5.75 x 2.87 x 0.31 inches | 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and White | Atlantis blue, Matrix purple and Phoenix red |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 440.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD | IPS LCD |
| 424 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P10 MT6755 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP2 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.48 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Poco X2 is slightly better than HTC U Play, with a overall score of 79.3 against 73.5. Xiaomi Poco X2's design is a lot newer than the HTC U Play's, although it is way heavier and somewhat thicker. The HTC U Play has a little sharper display than Xiaomi Poco X2, because although it has a lot smaller screen and a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 1920 pixels, it also counts with a just a little higher pixels density.
HTC U Play features much more storage for games and applications than Xiaomi Poco X2, because although it has just 32 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. Xiaomi Poco X2 features a little faster CPU than HTC U Play, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Poco X2 also has 3 GB more RAM.
The Xiaomi Poco X2 captures much clearer videos and photos than HTC U Play, because it has a larger aperture for better low-light images, a way more megapixels back-facing camera and a much higher (4K) video resolution. Xiaomi Poco X2 features a way better battery duration than HTC U Play, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.