Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2017-03-01 | 2020-09-08 |
| 5.75 x 2.87 x 0.31 inches | 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.37 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and White | Cobalt blue and Shadow gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 440.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD | IPS LCD |
| 424 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 450 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P10 MT6755 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP2 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5160mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.48 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC is much better than HTC U Play, with an 81.6 score against 73.5. Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC's design is much newer than the HTC U Play's, although it is a lot heavier and thicker. Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC features a bit sharper display than HTC U Play, because although it has a just a little inferior count of pixels per screen inch, it also counts with a larger screen and a little bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels.
HTC U Play has more memory capacity for apps and games than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has a bit better performance than HTC U Play, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC also has 3 GB more RAM.
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC features a much better battery life than HTC U Play, because it has 5160mAh of battery capacity. Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC captures way better pictures and videos than HTC U Play, because it has a bigger camera aperture to take better photos and video in low light situations, a way higher resolution back-facing camera and a much better (4K) video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.