Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 82.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2017-03-01 | 2021-03-24 |
| 5.75 x 2.87 x 0.31 inches | 6.46 x 3.01 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and White | Glacier Blue, Gradient Bronze and Onyx Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 440.00 | $ 279.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD | AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P10 MT6755 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP2 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5020mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.48 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro has a score of 82.4, which is much better than the HTC U Play's 73.5 score. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro's construction is way newer than the HTC U Play's, although it's a little thicker and way heavier. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro features a brighter display than HTC U Play, because although it has a just a bit less pixels per screen inch, it also counts with a larger screen and a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro has a bit more powerful CPU than HTC U Play, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro captures way better videos and photos than HTC U Play, because it has a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better captures and video in low-light environments, a lot higher 3840x2160 video quality and a camera in the back with a much better resolution.
HTC U Play features a bit bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro, because although it has only 32 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that supports up to 1,95 TB. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro features a much longer battery lifetime than HTC U Play, because it has a 5020mAh battery capacity.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro not only is the best devices of the ones we are comparing, but it's also very cheap compared to the other ones, which makes it a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.