Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 77.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2017-03-01 | -- |
| 5.75 x 2.87 x 0.31 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and White | Atlantic Blue, Graphite Gray and Polar White |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 440.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 2080 pixels |
| S-LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 474 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P10 MT6755 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665G SM6375 (6 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP2 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.48 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G has an overall score of 77.1, which is a bit better than HTC U Play's 73.5 overall score. Although it's the best in our current comparison, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G is a just a bit thicker and notably heavier phone than HTC U Play. HTC U Play counts with a very superior hardware performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have 8 cpu cores.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G has a brighter display than HTC U Play, because it has a just a little higher screen density, a bigger screen and a much higher 2080 x 2400 resolution. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G has a little bit more storage capacity to store more apps and games than HTC U Play, because although it has a SD card slot that allows 976 GB smaller, it also counts with 32 GB more internal memory.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G counts with a superior battery performance than HTC U Play, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 2500mAh. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G takes a lot better photographs and videos than HTC U Play, because it has a bigger camera aperture, a lot more MP camera in the back and a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.