Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2017-03-01 | 2020-05-05 |
| 5.75 x 2.87 x 0.31 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and White | Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 440.00 | $ 291.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD | IPS LCD |
| 424 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P10 MT6755 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP2 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.48 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a score of 81.1, which is better than the HTC U Play's 73.5 overall score. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro's construction is much newer, but thicker and extremely heavier than the HTC U Play. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with just a little better hardware performance than HTC U Play, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also has 3 GB more RAM.
HTC U Play has just a bit better screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because although it has a lot smaller screen and a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 1920, it also counts with a quite better screen pixel density. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro shoots much clearer pictures and videos than HTC U Play, because it has a bigger diafragm aperture for better low-light images, a much higher video quality and a camera with way more megapixels.
The HTC U Play features a bit more storage for games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because although it has only 32 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that supports up to 1,95 TB. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features a much better battery life than HTC U Play, because it has 5020mAh of battery capacity.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro not only is the best phones in our comparison, but it's also a bargain compared to others.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.