Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 93.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Apple |
| -- | iOS 15.x, 14.x |
| 2017-02-21 | 2020-11-13 |
| 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches | 6.33 x 3.07 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 8.03 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Gold, Graphite, Pacific blue and Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 749.00 | $ 1100.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2778 x 1284 pixels |
| S-LCD 5 | OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset | Apple A14 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | 64-bit 64-bit (Hexa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 8.91 | 10.62 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3687mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone 12 Pro Max is a lot better than the HTC U Ultra, getting a score of 93.2 against 77. The iPhone 12 Pro Max body is incredibly newer and a little bit thinner, but noticeably heavier than HTC U Ultra. The iPhone 12 Pro Max features a better performance than HTC U Ultra, because it has 2 GB more RAM, a higher number of cores and a 64 bits processor.
The Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max has a brighter display than HTC U Ultra, because although it has a bit worse quantity of pixels per inch in the screen and a bit worse 1284 x 2778 pixels resolution, it also counts with a larger screen. HTC U Ultra features a very superior storage capacity for games and applications than Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that holds up to 1,95 TB.
Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max features a bit better camera than HTC U Ultra, and although they both have a same resolution back-facing camera and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max also has faster video frame rate and a larger aperture. IPhone 12 Pro Max features greater battery performance than HTC U Ultra, because it has a 3687mAh battery size.
Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max costs a lot more than HTC U Ultra, but you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.