Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Apple |
| 2017-02-21 | 2017-11-03 |
| 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Silver and Space gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 749.00 | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| S-LCD 5 | OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 8.91 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone X has an overall score of 88.1, which is better than HTC U Ultra's global score of 77. Although the iPhone X and HTC U Ultra were released with only a few months difference, iPhone X's body is a bit heavier but a little bit thinner than HTC U Ultra. The Apple iPhone X features a better processor than HTC U Ultra, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a 64-bit processor and a greater number of faster cores.
IPhone X counts with a little sharper display than HTC U Ultra, because although it has a little bit worse resolution of 1125 x 2436 and a just a bit inferior quantity of pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a little bit bigger display. The iPhone X has just a bit better camera than HTC U Ultra, because although it has a lot smaller sensor capturing much worse quality videos and photos, and they both have a 12 MP camera, a F1.8 aperture and the same (4K) video resolution, the iPhone X also counts with faster 60 fps video frame rates.
The HTC U Ultra features a greater storage to install games and applications than Apple iPhone X, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 1,95 TB. The HTC U Ultra counts with a little longer battery duration than Apple iPhone X, because it has 3000mAh of battery capacity.
The iPhone X costs a lot more money than HTC U Ultra, but you can get a better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.