Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 77.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Asus |
| 2017-02-21 | 2018-10-29 |
| 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches | 6.25 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 749.00 | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD 5 | AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| -- | 550 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 3.63 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Asus ROG Phone is a little bit better than the HTC U Ultra, getting a global score of 77.1 against 77. The Asus ROG Phone construction is newer than HTC U Ultra's, although it is a little bit thicker and heavier. The Asus ROG Phone has a bit more vivid display than HTC U Ultra, because although it has a little inferior amount of pixels per inch of display and a lot worse 1080 x 2160px resolution, it also counts with a little bigger display.
Asus ROG Phone features a way bigger memory capacity for apps and games than HTC U Ultra, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with more internal storage. The Asus ROG Phone features a bit more powerful processor than HTC U Ultra, because it has more RAM memory and a larger number of cores.
The Asus ROG Phone features longer battery life than HTC U Ultra, because it has a 33 percent more battery size. The HTC U Ultra counts with a greater camera than Asus ROG Phone, because although it has worse 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have a same size diafragm aperture and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the HTC U Ultra also counts with a bigger back camera sensor providing a higher image quality.
Although Asus ROG Phone is a better device, it costs a lot more money than HTC U Ultra, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the HTC U Ultra. If you want to save a few dollars, you can get HTC U Ultra, giving up a couple features and specs, but you'll get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.