Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Asus |
| 2017-02-21 | 2020-07-23 |
| 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches | 6.73 x 3.07 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 8.47 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black glare |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 749.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD 5 | AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 390 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3090 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Asus ROG Phone 3 is better than HTC U Ultra, having an 86.3 score against 77. Asus ROG Phone 3's design is extremely newer, but heavier and incredibly thicker than HTC U Ultra. The Asus ROG Phone 3 features a slightly better display than HTC U Ultra, because although it has a little lower pixels density and a little bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2340, it also counts with a larger display.
The HTC U Ultra features a much bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Asus ROG Phone 3, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Asus ROG Phone 3 has a better performing processor than HTC U Ultra, because it has a greater number of faster cores and a greater amount of RAM memory.
The Asus ROG Phone 3 has a very superior battery lifetime than HTC U Ultra, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh. Asus ROG Phone 3 captures much clearer photographs and videos than HTC U Ultra, and although they both have a same size aperture, the Asus ROG Phone 3 also has a lot more megapixels back-facing camera, a lot better video quality and a way bigger back camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.