Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | |
| 2017-02-21 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches | 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 749.00 | $ 487.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| S-LCD 5 | OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4 XL has an overall score of 82.9, which is a little bit better than the HTC U Ultra's general score of 77. The Google Pixel 4 XL is a extremely newer cellphone than the HTC U Ultra, but it's a little thicker and heavier. Google Pixel 4 XL has just a bit better hardware performance than HTC U Ultra, because it has a larger number of cores and more RAM.
The Google Pixel 4 XL counts with a little more vivid display than HTC U Ultra, because it has a quite larger screen, a quite higher pixel density and a quite better resolution of 1440 x 3040px. HTC U Ultra counts with a lot bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Google Pixel 4 XL, and although they both have the same internal memory capacity, the HTC U Ultra also has a SD card slot that allows up to 1,95 TB.
The Google Pixel 4 XL counts with longer battery performance than HTC U Ultra, because it has 3700mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh. The HTC U Ultra captures just a bit better videos and photos than Google Pixel 4 XL, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not so good for low light photography and video, a worse 12 mega-pixels resolution camera in the back and a lower (4K) video quality, it also counts with a larger sensor which offers a higher image and video quality.
Google Pixel 4 XL is not only the best devices of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also by far the cheapest one, which makes it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.