Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-02-21 | 2020-08-20 |
| 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches | 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Just black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 749.00 | $ 349.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD 5 | OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a is a bit better than HTC U Ultra, with a score of 82.9 against 77. Google Pixel 4a is a incredibly newer and somewhat lighter cellphone than the HTC U Ultra, but it is a bit thicker. The HTC U Ultra counts with just a bit better looking display than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a just a little more pixels per inch in the screen and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560px.
Google Pixel 4a counts with a bit faster CPU than HTC U Ultra, because it has more processing cores and more RAM. HTC U Ultra features a way bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Google Pixel 4a features a little better battery lifetime than HTC U Ultra, because it has 3140mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh. The HTC U Ultra features a bit better camera than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not recommended for capturing images and/or video in low light environments, a less mega pixels camera in the back and a lower (4K) video definition, it also counts with a larger sensor taking better quality videos and pictures.
Google Pixel 4a not only is the best devices between the ones we are comparing, but it's also a bargain compared to the other devices.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.