Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2017-02-21 | 2020-11-19 |
| 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches | 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Clearly white and Just black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 749.00 | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD 5 | OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3885mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4a 5G has a score of 87.5, which is much better than the HTC U Ultra's 77 global score. Google Pixel 4a 5G's body is newer and just a little lighter than HTC U Ultra's, although it's just a bit thicker. The Google Pixel 4a 5G has a bit faster processor than HTC U Ultra, because it has more processing cores and more RAM.
HTC U Ultra has a slightly better screen than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a just a little greater pixels amount per inch in the screen and a better 1440 x 2560px resolution. The Google Pixel 4a 5G shoots just a bit better photos and videos than HTC U Ultra, because although it has a smaller camera sensor taking worse quality videos and photographs, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Google Pixel 4a 5G also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better photos in low-light situations, a better resolution back camera and better 60 fps video frame rate.
The HTC U Ultra counts with a much better storage for applications and games than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with an external memory slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. Google Pixel 4a 5G features superior battery performance than HTC U Ultra, because it has a 30% larger battery capacity.
Google Pixel 4a 5G not only is the best phones in our comparison, but it's also a lot cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.