Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2017-02-21 | 2021-06-25 |
| 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches | 6.44 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Amber Red, Emerald Green, Frost Crystal and Midnight Black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 749.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2676 x 1236 pixels |
| S-LCD 5 | OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 440 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 670, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 17.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
HTC U Ultra has a score of 77, which is a bit better than the Honor 50 Pro's 77 overall score. The HTC U Ultra design has the same thickness than the Honor 50 Pro, but it is just a little bit lighter. The HTC U Ultra has just a bit better screen than Honor 50 Pro, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a bit greater pixel density and a quite better resolution of 1440 x 2560px.
The Honor 50 Pro counts with a little faster CPU than HTC U Ultra, because it has 4 more CPU cores and a greater amount of RAM. The HTC U Ultra counts with a better storage to store more games and applications than Honor 50 Pro, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with an external memory card slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Honor 50 Pro shoots much better photos and videos than HTC U Ultra, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is worse for taking photographs or videos in low light environments, and they both have the same (4K) video definition and the same video frame rates, the Honor 50 Pro also counts with a much more mega pixels back camera.
The Honor 50 Pro features better battery performance than HTC U Ultra, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.