Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 85.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | LG |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2017-02-21 | 2020-11-06 |
| 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches | 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 7.14 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Titan gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 749.00 | $ 395.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD 5 | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 619L GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
LG K92 has a global score of 85.4, which is much better than the HTC U Ultra's 77 overall score. LG K92 is a newer phone than HTC U Ultra, but it's somewhat heavier and just a little thicker. The LG K92 counts with a bit more powerful processor than HTC U Ultra, because it has a larger number of cores (but slower) and 2 GB more RAM memory.
The HTC U Ultra has a bit sharper display than LG K92, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels and a higher display density. LG K92 shoots much better pictures and videos than HTC U Ultra, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the same video frame rates and the same camera aperture, the LG K92 also has a camera with a way higher resolution and a bigger back-facing camera sensor taking better quality photographs and videos.
The LG K92 has more memory capacity for apps and games than HTC U Ultra, and although they both have a SD extension slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB, the LG K92 also has 128 GB internal storage. LG K92 counts with superior battery performance than HTC U Ultra, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
In addition to being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, the LG K92 is also by far the cheapest one, which makes this phone a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.