Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 76.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | LG |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2017-02-21 | 2020-05-20 |
| 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches | 6.75 x 3.06 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Holographic white |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 749.00 | $ 233.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD 5 | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset | MediaTek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The HTC U Ultra has a global score of 77, which is just a bit better than the LG Stylo 6's overall score of 76.7. HTC U Ultra's body is much lighter and a little thinner than LG Stylo 6, although it was released many years before. The HTC U Ultra features a little sharper display than LG Stylo 6, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a bit higher 1440 x 2560 resolution and more pixels per inch of screen.
LG Stylo 6's memory for games and applications is just as good as HTC U Ultra's one, both of them have a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB and equal 64 GB internal storage. The LG Stylo 6 has a bit better processor than HTC U Ultra, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM, the LG Stylo 6 also has a higher number of cores.
LG Stylo 6 features superior battery life than HTC U Ultra, because it has a 33% bigger battery capacity. The HTC U Ultra has a bit better camera than LG Stylo 6, because although it has a lesser mega-pixels back facing camera, and they both have a F1.8 aperture, the HTC U Ultra also counts with a lot better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a lot larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
Although HTC U Ultra is a better device, it costs a lot more than the LG Stylo 6, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as LG Stylo 6. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can buy the LG Stylo 6, letting go a few features and specs, but you'll get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.