Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | LG |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2017-02-21 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches | 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Aurora black and Moroccan blue |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 749.00 | $ 204.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| S-LCD 5 | P-OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
LG V40 ThinQ has a score of 81.2, which is slightly better than the HTC U Ultra's 77 general score. LG V40 ThinQ's design is newer, just a little bit thinner and just a little lighter than HTC U Ultra. The LG V40 ThinQ counts with a slightly better screen than HTC U Ultra, because it has a quite bigger screen, a little better screen pixels density and a slightly better resolution of 1440 x 3120.
LG V40 ThinQ features a little bit better hardware performance than HTC U Ultra, because it has a higher number of cores and more RAM memory. The LG V40 ThinQ takes a little bit better pictures and videos than HTC U Ultra, because although it has a smaller sensor shooting worse quality videos and images, and they both have the same resolution camera and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the LG V40 ThinQ also counts with a larger diafragm aperture for better images and video in low light environments and higher video frame rate.
The LG V40 ThinQ's storage to install applications and games is just as good as HTC U Ultra's one, they have a SD memory slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB and equal 64 GB internal storage capacity. LG V40 ThinQ features a little better battery life than HTC U Ultra, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
The LG V40 ThinQ is not only the best devices of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also by far the cheapest one, which makes it very easy to pick between these devices.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.