Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | LG |
| 2017-02-21 | 2020-05-15 |
| 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 749.00 | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD 5 | P-OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG Velvet has a global score of 87.1, which is better than HTC U Ultra's 77 overall score. The LG Velvet body has the same thickness than the HTC U Ultra, but it's a little heavier. LG Velvet features a little better performance than HTC U Ultra, because it has a higher amount of RAM memory and 4 more cores.
HTC U Ultra has a little bit better looking display than LG Velvet, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a better pixels density and a slightly higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels. LG Velvet features a better camera than HTC U Ultra, and although they both have the same video resolution, the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and a F1.8 aperture, the LG Velvet also has a way better 48 MP resolution back-facing camera and a bigger back camera sensor.
The LG Velvet features a bigger memory for apps and games than HTC U Ultra, and although they both have a slot for an SD memory card that admits up to 1,95 TB, the LG Velvet also has 128 GB internal storage capacity. LG Velvet counts with a much better battery life than HTC U Ultra, because it has 4300mAh of battery capacity.
Even being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, LG Velvet is also a bargain compared to others.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.