Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 91.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | LG |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2017-02-21 | 2020-10-15 |
| 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches | 6.67 x 2.93 x 0.43 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 9.17 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Aurora gray and Illusion Sky |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 749.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD 5 | P-OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 20.26 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG Wing is better than the HTC U Ultra, having a 91.2 score against 77. The LG Wing design is notably newer, but a lot thicker and way heavier than the HTC U Ultra. LG Wing counts with a bit faster processing unit than HTC U Ultra, because it has a greater amount of RAM and a higher number of cores.
HTC U Ultra counts with a little sharper display than LG Wing, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a greater pixel density. LG Wing has a much bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than HTC U Ultra, and although they both have an external memory slot that admits up to 1,95 TB, the LG Wing also has more internal storage capacity.
The LG Wing features longer battery performance than HTC U Ultra, because it has a 33% greater battery capacity. LG Wing takes much clearer photos and videos than HTC U Ultra, and although they both have a same size aperture and the same video resolution, the LG Wing also has a way bigger camera sensor providing a much better image quality, higher 60 frames per second video frame rate and a back-facing camera with lot more megapixels.
The LG Wing costs more than HTC U Ultra, but you can get a better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.