Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 86.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2017-02-21 | 2021-08-19 |
| 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches | 6.42 x 2.99 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Frosted Emerald, Frosted Grey and Frosted White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 749.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD 5 | -- |
| 515 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 670 Prime, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (920 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 20 is better than HTC U Ultra, with an 86.1 score against 77. Motorola Edge 20 is a newer device, and it is also a little bit thinner and just a bit lighter than HTC U Ultra. The Motorola Edge 20 features a little faster processor than HTC U Ultra, because it has more RAM memory and a larger number of cores.
The HTC U Ultra counts with a slightly better looking display than Motorola Edge 20, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution and a greater screen density. Motorola Edge 20 features a greater camera than HTC U Ultra, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for low-light images and video, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same (4K) video resolution, the Motorola Edge 20 also counts with a back-facing camera with much more MP.
HTC U Ultra has a way bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Motorola Edge 20, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that holds up to 1,95 TB. The Motorola Edge 20 counts with longer battery duration than HTC U Ultra, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.