Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2017-02-21 | 2021-08-19 |
| 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches | 6.53 x 2.99 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Electric Graphite and Lagoon Green |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 749.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD 5 | OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853V/ZA (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 20 Lite is much better than HTC U Ultra, with a global score of 87.1 against 77. Even though the Motorola Edge 20 Lite is notably newer than the HTC U Ultra, it is just a little heavier and just a bit thicker. Motorola Edge 20 Lite has a bit faster CPU than HTC U Ultra, because it has a larger amount of RAM memory and 4 more cpu cores.
The HTC U Ultra features a little sharper screen than Motorola Edge 20 Lite, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a greater display density and a better 1440 x 2560 resolution. The Motorola Edge 20 Lite counts with a much better camera than HTC U Ultra, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Motorola Edge 20 Lite also counts with a much higher resolution camera and better video frame rate.
The HTC U Ultra counts with a slightly bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Motorola Edge 20 Lite, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that holds up to 1,95 TB. The Motorola Edge 20 Lite features a way better battery life than HTC U Ultra, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.