Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 92.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Motorola |
| -- | Android 12, 11 |
| 2017-02-21 | 2021-08-19 |
| 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches | 6.42 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Blue Vegan Leather, Iridescent White and Midnight Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 749.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD 5 | OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragonn 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 20 Pro is a lot better than HTC U Ultra, getting a 92.8 score against 77. Motorola Edge 20 Pro's body has the same thickness than HTC U Ultra, but it's somewhat heavier. The HTC U Ultra features a slightly better display than Motorola Edge 20 Pro, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a greater screen pixel density.
The HTC U Ultra features a bigger memory capacity for applications and games than Motorola Edge 20 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a SD card slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. Motorola Edge 20 Pro counts with a faster processor than HTC U Ultra, because it has a greater amount of RAM and more cpu cores.
Motorola Edge 20 Pro features a very superior battery performance than HTC U Ultra, because it has a 50% bigger battery size. Motorola Edge 20 Pro takes greater photographs and videos than HTC U Ultra, because although it has a tinier aperture, it also counts with a much better 7680x4320 video definition and a back camera with a lot higher 108 megapixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.