Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 78.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Motorola |
| -- | Android 12 |
| 2017-02-21 | 2022-09-08 |
| 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 2.83 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Aurora White, Cosmic Grey, Neptune Blue and Solar Gold |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 749.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD 5 | P-OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 8.91 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 12.65 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4400mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion is slightly better than the HTC U Ultra, with a 78.5 score against 77. The Motorola Edge 30 Fusion construction is noticeably newer, a little thinner and a little bit lighter than the HTC U Ultra. HTC U Ultra features a much better performing processing unit than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, although it has 4 GB less RAM memory and 4 lesser processing cores.
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion has a slightly better looking screen than HTC U Ultra, because although it has a just a bit lower pixel count in each inch of screen and a little bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2400, it also counts with a quite larger screen. The HTC U Ultra counts with a lot bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with an external memory card slot that allows up to 1,95 TB.
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion features a superior battery lifetime than HTC U Ultra, because it has a 47% bigger battery capacity. Motorola Edge 30 Fusion features a greater camera than HTC U Ultra, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture, the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion also has a way bigger back camera sensor which provides a lot better image and video quality, a much more mega pixels camera and a way better 7680x4320 video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.