Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 80.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Motorola |
| -- | Android 12 |
| 2017-02-21 | 2022-09-08 |
| 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches | 6.37 x 2.89 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 7.00 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Interstellar Black and Starlight White |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 749.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD 5 | OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1250 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 SM8475 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 8.91 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 60.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.82 inches (1/1.22") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 14.96 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra has a general score of 80.9, which is a bit better than HTC U Ultra's score of 77. The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra design is much newer than HTC U Ultra's, although it's a little bit thicker and somewhat heavier. HTC U Ultra counts with an extremely better CPU than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, because although it has 4 GB lesser RAM memory, it also counts with more processing cores.
The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra has a bit more vivid display than HTC U Ultra, because although it has a quite lower display pixels density and a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2400px, it also counts with a larger display. The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra counts with a lot better camera than HTC U Ultra, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is worse for shooting images and videos in low light environments, it also counts with a camera in the back with much more mega-pixels, a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a way better image quality and a way higher video quality.
The HTC U Ultra has a much bigger memory for games and applications than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. Motorola Edge 30 Ultra features a much longer battery performance than HTC U Ultra, because it has a 67 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.