Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 83.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Motorola |
| -- | Android 13 |
| 2017-02-21 | 2023-04-04 |
| 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches | 6.34 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Interstellar Black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 749.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD 5 | P-OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 740 GPU |
| 8.91 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 40 Pro is slightly better than the HTC U Ultra, having an 83.4 score against 77. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro construction is notably newer, but just a little bit thicker and somewhat heavier than the HTC U Ultra. Motorola Edge 40 Pro counts with a little sharper display than HTC U Ultra, because although it has a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a little bit inferior amount of pixels per screen inch, it also counts with a bigger screen.
The HTC U Ultra counts with a greater memory capacity for games and applications than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. The HTC U Ultra counts with a much better performing CPU than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, although it has a lower number of cores and less RAM memory.
Motorola Edge 40 Pro counts with a much longer battery lifetime than HTC U Ultra, because it has a 53 percent larger battery capacity. Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a lot better camera than HTC U Ultra, and although they both have the same camera aperture, the Motorola Edge 40 Pro also has a much more MP camera, a lot bigger camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a lot higher video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.