Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Motorola |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2017-02-21 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches | 6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black Beauty, Luxe Lavender, Moonlight Pearl and Vanilla Cream |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 749.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD 5 | P-OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 8.91 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro has an overall score of 86.3, which is better than the HTC U Ultra's 77 score. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro design is notably newer, but just a bit heavier and a little bit thicker than HTC U Ultra. The HTC U Ultra features a much greater processing power than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, although it has lesser processing cores and 8 GB lesser RAM.
Motorola Edge 50 Pro counts with a little bit better looking screen than HTC U Ultra, because although it has a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a bit lower amount of pixels per display inch, it also counts with a bigger screen. Motorola Edge 50 Pro shoots much better pictures and videos than HTC U Ultra, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Motorola Edge 50 Pro also has a lot bigger diafragm aperture to capture better photography in low light situations, a lot larger back camera sensor providing a much higher image quality and a back camera with way more mega-pixels.
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro features a much bigger memory to install games and applications than HTC U Ultra, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 448 GB more internal memory. Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a way better battery performance than HTC U Ultra, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.