Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-02-21 | 2020-04-16 |
| 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches | 6.29 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Smoke black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 749.00 | $ 150.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD 5 | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The HTC U Ultra is a little bit better than the Motorola Moto G Power, having a 77 score against 76.1. The HTC U Ultra construction is somewhat lighter and somewhat thinner than the Motorola Moto G Power, although it was released 3 years before. Motorola Moto G Power has a little bit better performance than HTC U Ultra, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM, the Motorola Moto G Power also has 4 more cpu cores (although they are slower).
HTC U Ultra counts with a little bit better looking display than Moto G Power, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution and a higher quantity of pixels per inch in the screen. The HTC U Ultra has a superior storage to store more apps and games than Motorola Moto G Power, and although they both have equal internal storage, the HTC U Ultra also has an external memory card slot that admits up to 1,95 TB.
Motorola Moto G Power has a much longer battery duration than HTC U Ultra, because it has a 5000mAh battery size. Moto G Power has just a bit better camera than HTC U Ultra, because although it has a tinier camera sensor providing a lower image quality, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same (4K) video resolution, the Moto G Power also counts with a larger aperture for better photos and videos in low-light situations and a camera in the back with a lot higher resolution.
Although HTC U Ultra is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Motorola Moto G Power, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Motorola Moto G Power. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can get the Motorola Moto G Power, giving up a few specs and features, but you'll get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.