Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Motorola |
| -- | Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2017-02-21 | 2016-09-01 |
| 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 749.00 | $ 250.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| S-LCD 5 | AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
HTC U Ultra is a bit better than the Moto Z Force, having a 77 score against 75.8. The HTC U Ultra is better than the Moto Z Force, it must be told that it's also a just a bit thicker and just a little heavier device. The Motorola Moto Z Force features a bit sharper screen than HTC U Ultra, because although it has a bit smaller screen, and they both have exactly the same resolution of 1440 x 2560px, the Motorola Moto Z Force also counts with a quite better screen pixels density.
The Motorola Moto Z Force counts with just a little better hardware performance than HTC U Ultra. Both of them have 4 GB of RAM and a Quad-Core processor. The Motorola Moto Z Force has a little bit better camera than HTC U Ultra, and although they both have the same video resolution, the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and a F1.8 aperture, the Motorola Moto Z Force also has a lot better 21 mega-pixels resolution camera in the back.
The Moto Z Force counts with as much storage capacity to store more apps and games as the HTC U Ultra one, both have the same internal storage and a slot for an external memory card that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. Moto Z Force has just a bit better battery lifetime than HTC U Ultra, because it has a 17% more battery size.
Although HTC U Ultra is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Moto Z Force, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Moto Z Force. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can get Moto Z Force, and give up a couple features, but you'll get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.