Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Motorola |
| 2017-02-21 | 2017-08-10 |
| 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches | 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 749.00 | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| S-LCD 5 | Super AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 2730mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Moto Z2 Force Edition has a general score of 77.4, which is a little bit better than the HTC U Ultra's score of 77. The Moto Z2 Force Edition body is notably thinner and somewhat lighter than HTC U Ultra, although they were only released with a few months difference. The Moto Z2 Force Edition has a bit better processing unit than HTC U Ultra, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM memory, the Moto Z2 Force Edition also has a greater number of faster cores.
The Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition features a bit sharper display than HTC U Ultra, because although it has a bit smaller screen, and they both have the same resolution of 1440 x 2560px, the Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition also counts with a little bit better pixel density. The HTC U Ultra captures slightly better pictures and videos than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have the same video frame rates, the same resolution camera and the same video definition, the HTC U Ultra also has a way bigger camera sensor which offers a way better image and video quality and a larger aperture to take better low light captures.
The HTC U Ultra and the Moto Z2 Force Edition both have very similar memory for games and applications, both of them have equal 64 GB internal memory and a SD card slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. HTC U Ultra features just a little better battery lifetime than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has a 10% bigger battery size.
Although Moto Z2 Force Edition is a better device, it costs a bit more money than the HTC U Ultra, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as HTC U Ultra. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy Moto Z2 Force Edition, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and get the HTC U Ultra, resigning a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.