Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 84.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Motorola |
| 2017-02-21 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches | 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Oxford blue |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 749.00 | $ 398.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD 5 | LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola One 5G is slightly better than the HTC U Ultra, having an 84.6 score against 77. Motorola One 5G's construction is noticeably newer than HTC U Ultra's, but it's heavier and somewhat thicker. The Motorola One 5G counts with a bit better performance than HTC U Ultra, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM memory, the Motorola One 5G also has more cores.
The HTC U Ultra has a little more vivid display than Motorola One 5G, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a bit higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a higher display density. Motorola One 5G features just a bit more storage capacity to install games and applications than HTC U Ultra, because although it has a SD extension slot that allows 1000 GB smaller, it also counts with 64 GB more internal memory.
The Motorola One 5G counts with a much better camera than HTC U Ultra, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Motorola One 5G also has a larger aperture, a lot higher resolution back facing camera and a bigger back camera sensor.
The Motorola One 5G counts with a way better battery duration than HTC U Ultra, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Even being the best phone in this comparison, the Motorola One 5G is also very cheap compared to the other ones, making it a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.