Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Motorola |
| 2017-02-21 | 2021-01-14 |
| 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches | 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 7.48 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Frosted silver and Volcanic grey |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 749.00 | $ 395.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD 5 | LTPS |
| 515 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola One 5G Ace is slightly better than HTC U Ultra, having a overall score of 81.6 against 77. The Motorola One 5G Ace design is notably newer than the HTC U Ultra's, but it is incredibly thicker and heavier. The HTC U Ultra has a bit more vivid screen than Motorola One 5G Ace, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution and a better pixels count per inch in the display.
The Motorola One 5G Ace counts with a little bit better hardware performance than HTC U Ultra, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM memory, the Motorola One 5G Ace also has a larger number of faster cores. Motorola One 5G Ace has a better camera than HTC U Ultra, and although they both have the same (4K) video quality and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Motorola One 5G Ace also has a larger camera aperture and a camera in the back with a lot higher 48 mega pixels resolution.
The HTC U Ultra counts with more storage for games and applications than Motorola One 5G Ace, and although they both have the same internal storage, the HTC U Ultra also has a slot for SD memory cards that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. Motorola One 5G Ace has a really longer battery life than HTC U Ultra, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Even being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, the Motorola One 5G Ace is also by far the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.