Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 78.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Motorola |
| 2017-02-21 | 2019-08-16 |
| 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Denim blue and Pearl white |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 749.00 | $ 304.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD 5 | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola One Action has a global score of 78.5, which is slightly better than HTC U Ultra's 77 overall score. Even though the Motorola One Action is newer than the HTC U Ultra, it is thicker and just a little heavier. HTC U Ultra features just a bit better looking display than Motorola One Action, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a little greater number of pixels per inch of display and a slightly better 1440 x 2560 resolution.
Motorola One Action has a bit superior CPU than HTC U Ultra, and although they both have the same RAM amount, the Motorola One Action also has 4 more CPU cores. HTC U Ultra captures a bit better photos and videos than Motorola One Action. Both of them have a same size aperture, the same 3840x2160 video resolution, a camera with a 12 mega-pixels and the same video frame rate.
Motorola One Action counts with slightly more storage capacity for games and applications than HTC U Ultra, because although it has a SD memory slot that allows a maximum of 1000 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 64 GB more internal storage capacity. The Motorola One Action counts with just a little bit longer battery duration than HTC U Ultra, because it has a 3500mAh battery size instead of 3000mAh.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, the Motorola One Action is also a lot cheaper, which makes this phone a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.