Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-02-21 | 2019-12-04 |
| 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches | 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 749.00 | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD 5 | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola One Hyper is just a bit better than the HTC U Ultra, having a 79.8 score against 77. Even though the Motorola One Hyper is incredibly newer than HTC U Ultra, it is somewhat thicker and somewhat heavier. The HTC U Ultra counts with a little more vivid display than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 and a higher amount of pixels per inch in the display.
The Motorola One Hyper counts with a bit better processor than HTC U Ultra, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM memory, the Motorola One Hyper also has a larger number of cores (although slower). The Motorola One Hyper features a little bit better memory capacity to store more games and applications than HTC U Ultra, because although it has a slot for an external memory card that supports 1000 GB smaller, it also counts with more internal storage capacity.
Motorola One Hyper features better battery lifetime than HTC U Ultra, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity. The Motorola One Hyper shoots much clearer photographs and videos than HTC U Ultra, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not favorable for taking photos and/or video in low light situations, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Motorola One Hyper also counts with a way more megapixels camera in the back.
Motorola One Hyper is not only the best phones in our current comparison, but it's also very cheap compared to the other ones, which makes this phone a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.