Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Motorola |
| 2017-02-21 | 2019-05-15 |
| 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Blue and Brown |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 749.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD 5 | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola One Vision has a global score of 80.7, which is a bit better than the HTC U Ultra's 77 global score. Motorola One Vision's construction is incredibly newer than the HTC U Ultra's, although it is a little heavier and just a little thicker. The HTC U Ultra features a little sharper display than Motorola One Vision, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a little bit higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a just a little more pixels per screen inch.
HTC U Ultra counts with a slightly bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Motorola One Vision, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that supports up to 1,95 TB. The Motorola One Vision has a little better hardware performance than HTC U Ultra, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM memory, the Motorola One Vision also has a greater number of cores.
Motorola One Vision features a much better camera than HTC U Ultra, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Motorola One Vision also has a bigger aperture to take better low light photography and video, a larger sensor shooting higher quality photographs and a back-facing camera with a lot better resolution.
Motorola One Vision has a little better battery duration than HTC U Ultra, because it has 3500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.