Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 87 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-02-21 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches | 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 749.00 | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2142 x 876 pixels |
| S-LCD 5 | OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 373 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola razr (2020) is much better than the HTC U Ultra, with a global score of 87 against 77. Motorola razr (2020)'s body has the same thickness than HTC U Ultra, but it's heavier. The Motorola razr (2020) counts with a bit faster processor than HTC U Ultra, because it has a higher amount of RAM and 4 more cpu cores.
The HTC U Ultra counts with a little more vivid display than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px and more pixels per inch in the screen. The Motorola razr (2020) counts with a superior camera than HTC U Ultra, and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rates, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a back camera with lot more megapixels, a larger diafragm aperture to take better low-light photos and videos and a bigger sensor providing a better image quality.
The HTC U Ultra counts with a bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that holds up to 1,95 TB. HTC U Ultra counts with a bit better battery lifetime than Motorola razr (2020), because it has 3000mAh of battery capacity instead of 2800mAh.
Motorola razr (2020) is way more expensive than HTC U Ultra, but you can get a better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.