Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Nokia |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2017-02-21 | 2020-11-12 |
| 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches | 6.77 x 3.09 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 7.97 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Meteor grey |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 749.00 | $ 700.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD 5 | LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 387 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 12.98 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Nokia 8 V 5G UW has an overall score of 80.3, which is just a bit better than the HTC U Ultra's general score of 77. Nokia 8 V 5G UW is a noticeably newer phone than the HTC U Ultra, but it's somewhat thicker and extremely heavier. Nokia 8 V 5G UW features a little faster processing unit than HTC U Ultra, because it has a higher number of faster cores and a higher amount of RAM.
HTC U Ultra features a bit better screen than Nokia 8 V 5G UW, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a higher quantity of pixels per inch of screen. HTC U Ultra has more storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Nokia 8 V 5G UW, and although they both have equal internal storage, the HTC U Ultra also has a SD memory card expansion slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Nokia 8 V 5G UW features a way better battery lifetime than HTC U Ultra, because it has a 4500mAh battery size. The Nokia 8 V 5G UW takes greater photographs and videos than HTC U Ultra, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same aperture, the Nokia 8 V 5G UW also has a much larger back camera sensor shooting way higher quality photographs, faster video frame rates and a camera with way more mega-pixels.
In addition to being the best phone in this comparison, the Nokia 8 V 5G UW is also cheap compared to the other phone, making this phone a simple decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.