Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Nokia |
| 2017-02-21 | 2019-03-03 |
| 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches | 6.10 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 749.00 | $ 699.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| S-LCD 5 | P-OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3320mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
HTC U Ultra has a score of 77, which is slightly better than Nokia 9 PureView's 76.4 general score. HTC U Ultra is a a little bit lighter device than the Nokia 9 PureView, but they are 0.31inches thick. Nokia 9 PureView counts with a bit better performance than HTC U Ultra, because it has 2 GB more RAM memory and a higher number of cores.
The Nokia 9 PureView features just a bit better looking screen than HTC U Ultra, because it has a little larger display, a quite better resolution of 1440 x 2880 and a little bit higher pixels count per inch of display. HTC U Ultra features a slightly better camera than Nokia 9 PureView, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates, the same video resolution, a same size aperture and a same resolution back facing camera, the HTC U Ultra also has a larger sensor providing a higher image quality.
The HTC U Ultra has a superior memory capacity for applications and games than Nokia 9 PureView, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Nokia 9 PureView counts with a bit superior battery duration than HTC U Ultra, because it has a 3320mAh battery capacity.
Although HTC U Ultra is a better device, it is a little more expensive than Nokia 9 PureView, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Nokia 9 PureView. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy the HTC U Ultra, but if you don't you can save some dollars and get the Nokia 9 PureView, resigning a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.