Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 77.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Nokia |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2017-02-21 | 2021-05-01 |
| 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches | 6.65 x 3.14 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Midnight Sun and Nordic Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 749.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1080 x 2400 pixels |
| S-LCD 5 | -- |
| 515 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G SM4350 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | -- |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 8.8 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4470mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Nokia X20 is just a bit better than the HTC U Ultra, getting a 77.2 score against 77. The Nokia X20 body is a lot newer, but thicker and a lot heavier than the HTC U Ultra. The HTC U Ultra has a little bit better screen than Nokia X20, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560px resolution and a higher screen pixel density.
The HTC U Ultra counts with a bit bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than Nokia X20, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. Nokia X20 has a bit better processor than HTC U Ultra, because it has 2 GB more RAM memory and a greater number of cores (although slower).
HTC U Ultra captures much better photos and videos than Nokia X20, although it has a much worse resolution back facing camera. Nokia X20 counts with a very superior battery lifetime than HTC U Ultra, because it has a 4470mAh battery size against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.