Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 80.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Nokia |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2017-02-21 | 2021-07-29 |
| 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches | 6.76 x 3.21 x 0.42 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 10.02 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Granite Gre and Ultra Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 749.00 | $ 550.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD 5 | -- |
| 515 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 550 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 SM4350 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 460 Gold, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4630mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Nokia XR20 is just a bit better than HTC U Ultra, having an 80.8 score against 77. The Nokia XR20 design is much newer than the HTC U Ultra's, but it is a lot thicker and much heavier. Nokia XR20 counts with a display that's very similar to the screen in HTC U Ultra, because although the Nokia XR20 has a little worse 1080 x 2400 resolution and a little lower display density, it also counts with a larger screen.
The Nokia XR20 has just a bit better hardware performance than HTC U Ultra, because it has a higher number of cores (although they are slower) and a larger amount of RAM. HTC U Ultra counts with a little bit better memory capacity for games and applications than Nokia XR20, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 1,95 TB.
Nokia XR20 features a way better battery life than HTC U Ultra, because it has a 54% more battery capacity. Nokia XR20 counts with just a bit better camera than HTC U Ultra, and although they both have a same size camera sensor, the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video quality and a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the Nokia XR20 also has a lot higher resolution back-facing camera and faster video frame rate.
Nokia XR20 is not only the best phones in our comparison, but it's also a bargain compared to others.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.