Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2017-02-21 | 2019-10-16 |
| 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches | 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Cyber shade |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 749.00 | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD 5 | AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
HTC U Ultra has a score of 77, which is a bit better than nubia Red Magic 3S's global score of 75.8. Although HTC U Ultra is older than the nubia Red Magic 3S, it's body is somewhat thinner and way lighter. The nubia Red Magic 3S features a quite better hardware performance than HTC U Ultra, because it has 8 GB more RAM and a higher number of cores.
HTC U Ultra features a little bit better screen than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution and a better screen pixels density. Nubia Red Magic 3S takes a lot better videos and photos than HTC U Ultra, because it has a larger aperture, a bigger sensor which provides a better image and video quality, a way better video resolution and a much more mega-pixels camera.
HTC U Ultra counts with a bigger storage for games and applications than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. The nubia Red Magic 3S features a much better battery duration than HTC U Ultra, because it has a 67 percent bigger battery size.
Although HTC U Ultra is a better device, it costs more money than nubia Red Magic 3S, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the nubia Red Magic 3S. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy the HTC U Ultra, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and get the nubia Red Magic 3S, resigning a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.