Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Oppo |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2017-02-21 | 2020-05-21 |
| 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches | 6.28 x 2.85 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Moonlight Black and Starry Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 749.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD 5 | AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass and Gyroscope |
Comparison review
OPPO Find X2 Neo is a little bit better than HTC U Ultra, with a global score of 77.7 against 77. The OPPO Find X2 Neo design is noticeably newer and just a little thinner than the HTC U Ultra's, but it is just a little heavier. The OPPO Find X2 Neo has a bit more vivid display than HTC U Ultra, because although it has a little lower resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a just a little lower display pixels density, it also counts with a bit bigger display.
The HTC U Ultra counts with a better memory for applications and games than OPPO Find X2 Neo, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with an external memory card slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. The OPPO Find X2 Neo has a bit more powerful processing unit than HTC U Ultra, because it has a larger amount of RAM memory and a higher number of cores.
The OPPO Find X2 Neo captures much better pictures and videos than HTC U Ultra, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same video frame rates, the OPPO Find X2 Neo also has a way more MP camera in the back, a larger aperture for better low light photography and videos and a larger sensor.
The OPPO Find X2 Neo counts with better battery duration than HTC U Ultra, because it has a 34 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.