Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 83.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Oppo |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2017-02-21 | 2020-05-14 |
| 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches | 6.50 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Ocean |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 749.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3168 x 1440 pixels |
| S-LCD 5 | OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 519 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4260mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The OPPO Find X2 Pro has an overall score of 83.1, which is a little bit better than the HTC U Ultra's general score of 77. The OPPO Find X2 Pro construction is newer, but thicker and heavier than HTC U Ultra. OPPO Find X2 Pro features just a bit better performance than HTC U Ultra, because it has a higher number of cores and a greater amount of RAM.
OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with a sharper screen than HTC U Ultra, because it has a bigger screen, a quite better 1440 x 3168 pixels resolution and a just a little higher pixel count in each display inch. The OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with a much better camera than HTC U Ultra, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has faster video frame rates, a larger aperture for better low light captures, a way larger camera sensor which gives a much better photo and video quality and a back facing camera with lot more mega-pixels.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro has a much greater storage for games and applications than HTC U Ultra, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory capacity. OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with a way better battery performance than HTC U Ultra, because it has 4260mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.