| Global Score | |
| 77 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Oppo |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2017-02-21 | -- |
| 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 6.24 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 749.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD 5 | AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Cortex-A78, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 1.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
HTC U Ultra is just a bit better than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G, getting a overall score of 77 against 77. HTC U Ultra is a a little bit thicker but a little bit lighter phone than the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G. OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G features a quite superior hardware performance than HTC U Ultra, because it has a higher number of cores (and also faster) and a larger amount of RAM memory.
The OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G features a little more vivid screen than HTC U Ultra, because although it has a bit lower 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution and a little bit worse quantity of pixels per screen inch, it also counts with a quite bigger display. The OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G has a better camera than HTC U Ultra, and although they both have the same video definition and the same video frame rate, the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G also has a back camera with lot more mega-pixels and a larger aperture.
HTC U Ultra features a better memory capacity to store more games and applications than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 1,95 TB. HTC U Ultra counts with a much better battery performance than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G.
Despite our efforts to provide accurate information in our reviews and specs, there may be errors or missing information in this website, please check the specifications the brand or seller provide with the product before you buy it. We are not responsible for any inconvinience resulting on the use of this website's information.
Certain content that appears on this site comes from Amazon Services LLC. This content is provided 'as is' and is subject to change or removal at any time.