Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 76.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2017-02-21 | -- |
| 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches | 6.47 x 3.07 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Blue Black, Gold, Light Gray and Light Green |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 749.00 | $ 230.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD 5 | Super AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset | Exynos 1330 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-G68 MP2 GPU |
| 8.91 | 6.03 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
HTC U Ultra has a global score of 77, which is just a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A16 5G's 76.2 general score. The HTC U Ultra is a somewhat lighter device than Samsung Galaxy A16 5G, but they are 0.31inches thick. Galaxy A16 5G features a little sharper screen than HTC U Ultra, because although it has a bit worse 1080 x 2340 resolution and a way lower count of pixels in each inch in the display, it also counts with a larger display.
The Samsung Galaxy A16 5G features a slightly better memory capacity to install games and applications than HTC U Ultra, because although it has an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity. The HTC U Ultra features an extremely better processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A16 5G, although it has an inferior number of cores (but faster), they both have the same RAM memory amount.
Samsung Galaxy A16 5G counts with a much better battery performance than HTC U Ultra, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh. The HTC U Ultra has a slightly better camera than Samsung Galaxy A16 5G, although it has a much lower 12 mega-pixels resolution camera, they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture.
Although HTC U Ultra is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Galaxy A16 5G, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Galaxy A16 5G. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can get Galaxy A16 5G, letting go a few features and specifications, but you'll get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.