Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2017-02-21 | 2019-10-05 |
| 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches | 6.43 x 3.05 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Blue, Green and Red |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 749.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1560 x 720 pixels |
| S-LCD 5 | TFT |
| 515 pixels per inch | 264 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 (14 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Cortex-A53 (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 8.91 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 8.91 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A20s is slightly better than HTC U Ultra, getting a 77 score against 77. Samsung Galaxy A20s is a a bit heavier cellphone than HTC U Ultra, but both of them have the same thickness. Galaxy A20s counts with a processing unit that is just as good as the CPU in HTC U Ultra, and although the Galaxy A20s has a higher number of cores , they both have the same RAM memory amount.
The HTC U Ultra has a much better display than Galaxy A20s, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a way better pixels amount per screen inch and a lot better 1440 x 2560 resolution. The HTC U Ultra features a much better camera than Galaxy A20s, because although it has a lesser mega-pixels resolution back camera, and they both have a same size camera aperture, the HTC U Ultra also counts with a much larger sensor taking lot better quality videos and photographs and a much higher (4K) video resolution.
HTC U Ultra counts with a much greater memory capacity to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A20s, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal memory, the HTC U Ultra also has a SD memory slot that holds up to 1,95 TB. The Galaxy A20s counts with longer battery life than HTC U Ultra, because it has a 4000mAh battery size instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.