Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| -- | Android 12, 11 |
| 2017-02-21 | 2021-07-02 |
| 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches | 6.27 x 2.90 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Mint, Violet and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 749.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| S-LCD 5 | Super AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 274 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset | MediaTek Helio G80 MT6769T (12 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Cortex-A75, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali G52 MC2 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 1.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
HTC U Ultra is slightly better than Galaxy A22, with a general score of 77 against 76.1. Even though the HTC U Ultra is much older than Galaxy A22, it's design is just a little bit lighter and just a bit thinner. Samsung Galaxy A22 counts with just a bit better hardware performance than HTC U Ultra, and although they both have the same RAM memory amount, the Samsung Galaxy A22 also has a greater number of cores (but slower).
The HTC U Ultra has a brighter screen than Samsung Galaxy A22, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a way higher 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution and a way greater pixel density. HTC U Ultra features a bit better camera than Galaxy A22, because although it has a way less MP camera, and they both have a same size camera aperture, the HTC U Ultra also counts with a much better video resolution.
HTC U Ultra features a better memory capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A22, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory, the HTC U Ultra also has an external SD slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. HTC U Ultra features a much longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy A22.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.