Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 84.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2017-02-21 | 2021-06-24 |
| 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches | 6.58 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 7.16 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Gray, Mint, Violet and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 749.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD 5 | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G has a score of 84.6, which is just a bit better than HTC U Ultra's overall score of 77. The Samsung Galaxy A22 5G design is incredibly newer than the HTC U Ultra's, but it is somewhat heavier and thicker. The HTC U Ultra counts with a little sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A22 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution and a better display density.
The HTC U Ultra counts with a greater storage capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A22 5G, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal memory capacity, the HTC U Ultra also has a slot for SD memory cards that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. Galaxy A22 5G has a bit better CPU than HTC U Ultra, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM memory, the Galaxy A22 5G also has a higher number of cores (and also faster).
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G takes clearer photographs and videos than HTC U Ultra, and although they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video quality and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Samsung Galaxy A22 5G also has a way more megapixels back-facing camera. The Samsung Galaxy A22 5G has a very superior battery performance than HTC U Ultra, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.