Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2017-02-21 | 2023-12-11 |
| 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches | 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 749.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD 5 | Super AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-G68 GPU |
| 8.91 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A25 5G is just a bit better than the HTC U Ultra, with a 79.9 score against 77. Galaxy A25 5G's body is incredibly newer, but heavier and just a little thicker than the HTC U Ultra. HTC U Ultra features a very superior processing power than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, although it has a smaller amount of RAM and less processing cores.
The Galaxy A25 5G counts with a bit better screen than HTC U Ultra, because although it has a little bit lower screen pixels density and a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, it also counts with a little larger display. The Galaxy A25 5G shoots better photographs and videos than HTC U Ultra, because although it has a smaller camera sensor offering a lower image quality, and they both have the same video frame rate, the same camera aperture and the same video definition, the Galaxy A25 5G also counts with a much more mega pixels back camera.
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G features a little bit better storage for games and applications than HTC U Ultra, because although it has a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 1 TB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity. The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G counts with a really longer battery life than HTC U Ultra, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.